The Supreme Court on Monday ordered a federal appeals court to take another look at the case of a death row inmate in Alabama ...
Under the Supreme Court’s jumbled recusal practices, Gorsuch effectively voted to execute Glossip without reading the briefs ...
The Glossip case mirrors an unfortunate trend. Recently other prosecutors have also confessed illusory “errors.” ...
Both sides told the Supreme Court that long-suppressed evidence about the state’s star witness undermined the case against the inmate, Richard Glossip. By Adam Liptak Reporting from Washington ...
The death penalty takes centerstage on Wednesday when Death Row inmate Richard Glossip’s case comes before the Supreme Court once again — this time with his supporters calling for a new trial.
However the Richard Glossip case comes out, Wednesday’s proceeding offered a chilling reminder that Justices Thomas and Alito ...
At the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday morning, the only thing Chief Justice John Roberts seemed to want to know was whether Richard Glossip would have been convicted and sent to death row if the ...
Last year’s order putting Richard Glossip’s execution on hold to give the Supreme Court more time to consider his appeals would have required the votes of at least five justices, though which justices ...
Richard Glossip returns to the Supreme Court to fight for a new trial to prove his innocence. (Don Knight) WASHINGTON (CN) — Richard Glossip’s second U.S. Supreme Court showdown appeared Wednesday to ...
Richard Glossip, the petitioner, argues that prosecutors concealed key evidence and allowed false testimony at his trial, securing a wrongful conviction. Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner F.